Home
Author Guide
Editor Guide
Reviewer Guide
Special Issue
Introduction
Special Issues List
Published Issues
journal menu
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing Service
Article Processing Charge
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Editorial Process
Subscription
Contact Us
General Information
ISSN:
2377-2891(Print); 2377-2905(Online)
Frequency:
Bimonthly
Editor-in-Chief:
Prof. Eric C. K. Cheng
Associate Executive Editor:
Ms. Jenny Jiang
DOI:
10.18178/ijlt
Abstracting/Indexing:
Google Scholar; Crossref, CNKI,
etc.
APC:
500 USD
E-mail
questions or comments to
IJLT Editorial Office
.
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Eric C. K. Cheng
Professor & Vice President (Academic)
Yew Chung College of Early Childhood Education, Hong Kong, China
As the Editor-in-Chief of IJLT, I invite you to contribute your scholarly work to our esteemed publication. IJLT serves as a beacon for original and impactful academic contributions in the realm of education, fostering multidisciplinary research and development to enhance teaching-learning processes globally. We welcome submissions spanning a wide spectrum of topics, from innovative program development to the integration of digital tools in education. Our scope encompasses areas such as student leadership, diversity in education, and collaborative initiatives, reflecting our commitment to a sustainable and inclusive society. [
Read More
]
What's New
2024-10-30
Vol. 10, No. 5, 2024 has been published!
2024-08-29
Vol. 10, No. 4, 2024 has been published!
2024-06-27
Vol. 10, No. 3, 2024 has been published!
Home
>
Published Issues
>
2018
>
Volume 4, No. 1, March 2018
>
How Much Guidance Students Need When Designing Experiments in a Computer-Supported Inquiry Learning Environment
Nikoletta Xenofontos, Zacharias Zacharia, and Tasos Hovardas
Department of Education, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
Abstract
—The aim of this study was to identify an optimum way to support students when designing experiments in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. For this purpose, we evaluated the impact of two different configurations of an experiment design tool on students’ content knowledge and inquiry skills in the context of electric circuits. The two configurations differed in the degree of guidance they offered to students. In the first condition the tool offered more structure during the design of the experiment by providing the variables at task, while in the second condition students were not provided any guidance in terms of the variables at hand. The sample of the study comprised of 41 ninth graders and the data were collected through the use of pre-and post-tests. The results showed that both conditions were conducive to student conceptual understanding; however, difference between conditions emerged for inquiry skills in favor of the second condition.
Index Terms
—inquiry learning, experiment design tool, scaffold, structuring, problematizing
Cite: Nikoletta Xenofontos, Zacharias Zacharia, and Tasos Hovardas, "How Much Guidance Students Need When Designing Experiments in a Computer-Supported Inquiry Learning Environment," International Journal of Learning and Teaching, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 20-24, March 2018. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.4.1.20-24
4-DL008
PREVIOUS PAPER
Design and Analysis of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Pedagogies in Higher Education
NEXT PAPER
Developing a FLIPPED-ACTION Model in a Language-Teaching Internship Program