Home
Author Guide
Editor Guide
Reviewer Guide
Special Issue
Introduction
Special Issues List
Published Issues
journal menu
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing Service
Article Processing Charge
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Editorial Process
Subscription
Contact Us
General Information
ISSN:
2377-2891(Print); 2377-2905(Online)
Frequency:
Quarterly
Editor-in-Chief:
Prof. Xabier Basogain
Associate Executive Editor:
Ms. Jenny Jiang
DOI:
10.18178/ijlt
Abstracting/Indexing:
Google Scholar; Crossref, CNKI,
etc.
E-mail questions
or comments to
IJLT Editorial Office
.
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Xabier Basogain
University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
I am very excited to serve as the first Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Learning and Teaching...[
Read More
]
What's New
2023-09-05
Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2023 issue has been published!
2023-06-06
Vol. 9, No. 2, June 2023 issue has been published!
2023-03-09
Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2023 issue has been published!
Home
>
Published Issues
>
2018
>
Volume 4, No. 1, March 2018
>
How Much Guidance Students Need When Designing Experiments in a Computer-Supported Inquiry Learning Environment
Nikoletta Xenofontos, Zacharias Zacharia, and Tasos Hovardas
Department of Education, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
Abstract
—The aim of this study was to identify an optimum way to support students when designing experiments in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. For this purpose, we evaluated the impact of two different configurations of an experiment design tool on students’ content knowledge and inquiry skills in the context of electric circuits. The two configurations differed in the degree of guidance they offered to students. In the first condition the tool offered more structure during the design of the experiment by providing the variables at task, while in the second condition students were not provided any guidance in terms of the variables at hand. The sample of the study comprised of 41 ninth graders and the data were collected through the use of pre-and post-tests. The results showed that both conditions were conducive to student conceptual understanding; however, difference between conditions emerged for inquiry skills in favor of the second condition.
Index Terms
—inquiry learning, experiment design tool, scaffold, structuring, problematizing
Cite: Nikoletta Xenofontos, Zacharias Zacharia, and Tasos Hovardas, "How Much Guidance Students Need When Designing Experiments in a Computer-Supported Inquiry Learning Environment," International Journal of Learning and Teaching, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 20-24, March 2018. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.4.1.20-24
4-DL008
PREVIOUS PAPER
Design and Analysis of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Pedagogies in Higher Education
NEXT PAPER
Developing a FLIPPED-ACTION Model in a Language-Teaching Internship Program